What do Portuguese MPs use Twitter for? : A study case of political communication in a country with a small Twitter Adoption rate

Sofia Ferro-Santos; Gustavo Cardoso; Susana Santos

doi:10.7764/cdi.58.72109

Autores/as

Sofia Ferro-Santos ISCTE-IUL https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1586-6339
Gustavo Cardoso ISCTE-IUL https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2067-4718
Susana Santos ISCTE-IUL https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5225-6671

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.58.72109

Palabras clave:

comunicación política, redes sociales, parlamentarios, Portugal, Twitter

Resumen

¿Para qué utilizan Twitter los diputados portugueses? Un estudio de caso de comunicación política en un país con una baja tasa de adopción de Twitter.
Portugal tiene la tasa de adopción de Twitter más baja de Europa occidental y un sistema político que no fomenta el contacto directo con el electorado. Entonces, ¿para qué utilizan Twitter los parlamentarios portugueses? Recopilamos y codificamos manualmente 2192 tweets de parlamentarios. El análisis revela que utilizan Twitter principalmente como herramienta de trabajo enfocada a la niche “élite twittera”. Twitter es significativamente más adoptado por parlamentarios varones, de partidos pequeños y no-conservadores y de los distritos electorales más grandes. Aunque el seguimiento en Twitter se ve afectado por el reconocimiento público, la popularidad sólo se ve afectada por la actividad.

Biografía del autor/a

Sofia Ferro-Santos, ISCTE-IUL

Ph.D. candidate in Communication Sciences at ISCTE-IUL, she holds an International Master in Management degree from Nova SBE. She is a visiting professor at the ISCTEIPPS postgraduate program in Communication and Politics, where she teaches political marketing and a seminar course. She has also collaborated on European projects such as EUMEPLAT and IBERIFIER. She has previously worked in strategic consulting for Hiscox and Everis (now NTT Data). Her research focuses on political communication. She was awarded a Ph.D. Merit Scholarship of the ISCTE-IUL for Communication Sciences (2021-2024).

Gustavo Cardoso, ISCTE-IUL

Tenured professor of Sociology of Communication at ISCTE-IUL and a researcher at CIES. He is also an associate researcher at CADIS (Center d'Analyse et d'Interventions Sociologiques) in Paris and Director of OberCom in Lisbon. He is currently the director of the Ph.D. in Communication Sciences and of three postgraduate programs in Communication at ISCTE-IUL, namely the postgraduate program in Journalism, the postgraduate program in Factchecking and disinformation, and the postgraduate program in Communication and Politics Advisory.

Susana Santos, ISCTE-IUL

Holds a Ph.D. from the ISCTE-IUL (2012), is a research fellow at CIES-IUL, and a visiting assistant at the department of Sociology, ISCTE-IUL. Since 2002, she has been working in several research projects in the fields of Sociology of Communication, Political Sociology and Sociology of Law. Co-coordinator of the thematic section of Sociology of Law and Justice of the Portuguese Sociological Association. Co-opted member of the Board of the Research Committee on Sociology of Law (RCSL) from the International Sociological Association (ISA). Sub-director of the postgraduate program in Communication and Politics Advisory.

Citas

Amaral, C. D. J. A. D. (2020). O Uso do Twitter enquanto ferramenta de campanhas eleitorais: o caso das eleições legislativas de outubro de 2019 em Portugal (The use of Twitter as an electoral campaign tool: the case of legislative elections in October 2019 in Portugal) (Master’s thesis, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa). http://hdl.handle.net/10071/21934

Barriga, A. D. C. (2017). Sobre a ausência de pluralismo nos média: como observar a invisibilidade do debate político nos novos média? (About the absence of pluralism in the media: how to observe the invisibility of political debate in the new media?). Im A. Moreira, E. Araújo, & H. Sousa (Eds.), Comunicação e Política: Tempos, Contextos e Desafios (Communication and Politics: Time, Contexts and Challenges) (pp. 21-43). Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade (CECS). https://hdl.handle.net/1822/45022

Barriga, A. C. (2015). O debate político nas "contra-esferas públicas": como se discute em 140 carateres? (Political debate in the "public counter-spheres": how is it discussed in 140 characters?). Media e Jornalismo, (Especial), 111-126.

Baxter, G., Marcella, R., & O'Shea, M. (2016). Members of the Scotish Parliament on Twitter: good constituency men (and women)? Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(4), 428-447. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-02-2016-0010

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2016). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bravo, R. B. & Del Valle, M. E. (2017). Opinion leadership in parliamentary Twitter networks: A matter of layers of interaction? Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(3), 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1337602

Cardoso, G., Couraceiro, P., Pinto-Martinho, A., Paisana, M., Vasconcelos, A., Crespo, M., Baldi, V., & Palma, N. (2022). Comentário Político Televisivo 2022 (Television Political Comment 2022). ISCTE.

Cardoso, G., Paisana, M., & Pinto-Martinho, A. (2023). Digital News Report Portugal 2023. OberCom.

Castanho Silva, B. & Proksch, S. O. (2022). Politicians unleashed? Political communication on Twitter and in parliament in Western Europe. Political Science Research and Methods, 10(4), 776–792. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.36

Castells, M. (2007). Communication, Power and Counter-Power in the Network Sociery. International Journal of Communication, 1, 238-266. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/46

Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104

Coleman, S. (2001). Online campaigning. In P. Norris (Ed.), Britain Votes 2001 (pp. 115-124). University Press Oxford.

Coleman, S. (2005). New mediation and direct representation: reconceptualizing representation in the digital age. New Media & Society, 7(2), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444805050745

Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research. SAGE.

Enjolras, B. (2014, January 8-9). How Politicians use Twitter and Does it Matter? The case of Norwegian National Politicians. Paper presented to the International Conference Democracy as Idea and Practice. University of Oslo. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3177.3123

Golbeck, J., Grimes, J. M., & Rogers, A. (2010). Twitter use by the U.S. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1612-1621. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21344

Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K., & Van't Harr, G. (2013). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters. Information, Communication and Society, 16(5), 692-716. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581

Graham, T., Jackson, D., & Broersma, M. (2018). The Personal in the Political on Twitter: Towards a Typology of Politicians’ Personalized Tweeting Behaviours. In J. Schwanholz, T. Graham, & P. Stoll (Eds.), Managing Democracy in the Digital Age. Springer.

Haman, M. & Skolnik, M. A. (2021). Politicians on Social Media. The online database of members of national parliaments on Twitter. Profesional De La Información, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.mar.17

Hemphill, L., Otterbacher, J., & Shapiro, M. (2013). What's Congress doing on twitter? In A. Bruckman & S. Counts (Chairs), Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (pp. 877-886). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441876

Jacobs, K. & Spierings, N. (2019). A populist paradise? Examining populists’Twitter adoption and use. Information, Communication & Society, 22(12), 1681-1696. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1449883

Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401

Kaplan, A. M. & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

Larsson, A. O. (2015). The UE Parliament on Twitter - Assessing the Permanent Online Practices of Parliamentarians. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 149-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.994158

Larsson, A. O. & Kalsnes, B. (2014). ‘Of course we are on Facebook’: Use and non-use of social media among Swedish and Norwegian politicians. European Journal of Communication, 29(6), 653-667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323114531383

Larsson, A. O. & Moe, H. (2011). Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society, 14(5), 729-747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811422894

López-Meri, A., Marcos-García, S., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2017). What do politicians do on Twitter? Functions and communication strategies in the Spanish electoral campaign of 2016. Profesional De La Información, 26(5), 795–804. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.02

Maireder, A., Ausserhofer, J., & Kittenberger, A. (2012). Mapping the Austrian Political Twittersphere: How politicians, journalists and political strategists (inter-)act on Twitter. In P. Parycek & N. Edelmann (Eds.), Proceedings of CeDem12 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (pp. 151-164). Danube University. http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/o:154914

Marcos-García, S., Alonso-Muñoz, L., & López-Meri, A. (2021). Campañas electorales y Twitter. La difusión de contenidos mediáticos en el entorno digital (Electoral campaigns and Twitter. The dissemination of media content in the digital environment). Cuadernos.Info, (48), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.48.27679

Mendiburo-Seguel, A., Alenda, S., Ford, T. E., Olah, A. R., Navia, P. D., & Argüello-Gutiérrez, C. (2022). #funnypoliticians: How Do Political Figures Use Humor on Twitter? Frontiers in Sociology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.788742

Moreira, T. E. (2011). Política 2.0 A utilização das redes sociais facebook e twitter em campanhas eleitorais e o caso das Presidenciais 2011 (Politics 2.0 The use of the social networks facebook and twitter in electoral campaigns and the case of the 2011 presidential elections) (Master’s thesis, Universidade do Porto). https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/67080/2/28301.pdf

Ozcetin, B. (2013). Between Representation and Participation: Political Twitter Use in Turkey. In 1st International Symposium on Media Studies (pp. 585-596). Antalya.

Pek, J., Wong, O., & Wong, A. C. (2018). How to Address Non-normality: A Taxonomy of Approaches, Reviewed, and Illustrated. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02104

Penha, L. M. (2023). A comunicação política do CHEGA e da Iniciativa Liberal nas legislativas de 2019 e 2022: o papel dos media sociais online no agendamento político (The political communication of CHEGA and the Liberal Initiative in the 2019 and 2022 legislative elections: the role of online social media in political agenda-setting) (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade de Lisboa). http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/27259

Peucker, M., Fisher, T. J., & Davey, D. (2022). Mainstream media use in far-right online ecosystems. Centre for Resilient and Inclusive Societies. https://doi.org/10.56311/GWLU8673

Pinto, C. G. (2019). A Força das Ideias: História de uma Eleição (The Power of Ideas: The Story of an Election). Alêtheia Editores.

Praet, S., Martens, D., & Aelst, P. V. (2021). Patterns of democracy? Social network análisis of parliamentary Twitter networks in 12 countries. Online Social Networks and Media, 24, 100154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2021.100154

Quinlan, S., Gummer, T., Roßmann, J., & Wolf, C. (2018). ‘Show me the money and the party!’– variation in Facebook and Twitter adoption by politicians. Information, Communication & Society, 21(8), 1031-1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301521

Rauchfleisch, A. & Metag, J. (2020). Beyond normalization and equalization on Twitter: Politicians’ Twitter use during non-election times and influences of media attention. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 9(2), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00021_1

Rodotà, S. (2007). Democracy, innovation, and the information society. In P. Goujon, S. Lavelle, P. Duquenoy, K. Kimppa, & V. Laurent (Eds.), The Information Society: Innovations, Legitimacy, Ethics and Democracy (pp. 17-26). IFIP.

Ruoho, I. A. & Kuusiplao, J. (2019). The Inner Circle of Power on Twitter? How Politicians and Journalists Form a Virtual Network Elite in Finland. Observatorio (OBS*), 13(1), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS13120191326

Scherpereel, J. A., Wohlgemuth, J., & Schmelzinger, M. (2017). The Adoption and Use of Twitter as a Representational Tool among Members of the European Parliament. European Politics and Society, 18(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1151125

Small, T. A. (2010). Canadian Politics in 140 Characters: Party Politics in the Twitterverse. Canadian Parliamentary Review, 39-45.

Teixeira, C. P., Freire, A., & Belchior, A. M. (2012). Parliamentary representation in Portugal: Deputies’ focus and style of representation. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 11(2), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.1386/pjss.11.2.99_1

van Vliet, L., Törnberg, P., & Uitermark, J. (2020). The Twitter parliamentarian database: Analyzing Twitter politics across 26 countries. PLoS ONE, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237073

Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2011). Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics, 19(3), 477-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811407580