Growth responses after a future crop tree thinning and a thinning from below in a second-growth Nothofagus pumilio forest in Tierra del Fuego, Chile
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7764/rcia.v45i3.1856Keywords:
Climatic factors, lenga, Patagonia, thinning treatmentsAbstract
G.E. Cruz, F.A. Rodríguez, P.A. Tapia, and H.E. Bown. 2018. Growth responses after a
future crop tree thinning and a thinning from below in a second-growth Nothofagus pumilio
forest in Tierra del Fuego, Chile. Cien. Inv. Agr. 45(3): 263-276. Nothofagus pumilio (lenga)
is the most important native species for timber production in southern Patagonia both in Chile
and Argentina. Thinning application to second-growth N. pumilio forests has been limited in
Patagonia, probably because of the long time necessary for the investment to be recovered. In
addition, experimental trials have focused mostly on thinnings from below, leaving a high residual
stand density, which has led to a modest growth response. Using measurements (1995–2014)
obtained from a thinning trial carried out in a second-growth N. pumilio forest located in Tierra
del Fuego (Chile), the objective of this case study was to analyze whether selective thinnings with
future crop trees (in the sense of Z-Bäumen thinning) promote greater growth responses than
those from a thinning from below. In addition, we explored the associations between climatic
factors and age on N. pumilio tree growth. Trial treatments comprised a control, a thinning from
below and a future crop tree thinning. The growth response after a future crop tree thinning was
greater and lasted for a longer period (10 yrs) than did the thinning from below (4 yrs). The tree
basal area and diameter at breast height (dbh) growth increased with dbh and annual absolute
minimum temperature and decreased with age for the unthinned treatment during the period from
1977–2014 (~70–110 yrs old). Our results suggest that the future crop thinning might be a better
alternative than the thinning from below for secondary N. pumilio forests in Patagonia due to the
greater growth response while being a less intensive silvicultural method.