Diseño y sensibilidades somáticas

Contenido principal del artículo

Claudia Núñez-Pacheco
Marianela Ciolfi Felice
Vasiliki Tsaknaki

Resumen

 Cultivar la sensibilidad somática implica aumentar nuestra apre­ciación sensorial como vía para idear experiencias multisensoriales significativas en el diseño de interacción. Inmersos en un mundo cada vez más digitalizado y centrado en los datos, los proyectos de investigación centrados en la realidad sensorial, corporizada y material de nuestra experiencia, podrían empezar a perder impulso. Por otra parte, la pandemia también ha desplazado nuestros laboratorios, trasladándolos desde el carácter público del taller a la intimidad de nuestros hogares, aportando beneficios y retos inesperados. Los artículos incluidos en este número se centran en las experiencias sensoriales y materiales de diseñadoras que trabajan con métodos de diseño que ponen los modos somá­ticos de indagación en primer plano, mostrando cómo estos cambios podrían abrir nuevas oportunidades para subrayar la importancia de las prácticas corporizadas y somáticas en el diseño y la HCI.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Núñez-Pacheco, C., Ciolfi Felice, M., & Tsaknaki, V. (2022). Diseño y sensibilidades somáticas. Diseña, (20), Intro. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.20.Intro (Original work published 31 de enero de 2022)
Sección
Introducción Investigaciones Originales

Citas

Alfaras, M., Tsaknaki, V., Sanches, P., Windlin, C., Umair, M., Sas, C., & Höök, K. (2020). From Biodata to Somadata. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Article 555. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376684

Balaam, M., Comber, R., Clarke, R. E., Windlin, C., Ståhl, A., Höök, K., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2019). Emotion Work in Experience-Centered Design. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300832

Balaam, M., Woytuk, N. C., Felice, M. C., Afsar, O. K., Ståhl, A., & Søndergaard, M. L. J. (2020). Intimate Touch. Interactions, 27(6), 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3427781

Buchenau, M., & Suri, J. F. (2000). Experience Prototyping. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1145/347642.347802

Campo Woytuk, N., Søndergaard, M. L. J., Ciolfi Felice, M., & Balaam, M. (2020). Touching and Being in Touch with the Menstruating Body. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Article 344. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376471

Ciolfi Felice, M., Søndergaard, M. L. J., & Balaam, M. (2021). Resisting the Medicalisation of Menopause: Reclaiming the Body through Design. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445153

Haraway, D. (1995). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. In A. Feenberg & A. Hannay (Eds.), Technology and the Politics of Knowledge (pp. 175–194). Indiana University Press.

Helms, K. (2019). Do You Have to Pee? A Design Space for Intimate and Somatic Data. Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 1209–1222. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322290

Höök, K. (2018). Designing with the Body: Somaesthetic Interaction Design. MIT Press.

Höök, K., Eriksson, S., Louise Juul Søndergaard, M., Ciolfi Felice, M., Campo Woytuk, N., Kilic Afsar, O., Tsaknaki, V., & Ståhl, A. (2019). Soma Design and Politics of the Body. Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363385

Loke, L., & Robertson, T. (2013). Moving and Making Strange: An Embodied Approach to Movement-Based Interaction Design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1145/2442106.2442113

Loke, L., & Schiphorst, T. (2018). The Somatic Turn in Human-Computer Interaction. Interactions, 25(5), 54–5863. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236675

Lupton, E., & Lipps, A. (Eds.). (2018). The Senses: Design Beyond Vision. Princeton Architectural Press.

Márquez Segura, E., Turmo Vidal, L., Rostami, A., & Waern, A. (2016). Embodied Sketching. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 6014–6027. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858486

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge.

Nicolescu, B. (2014). Methodology of Transdisciplinarity. World Futures, 70(3–4), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2014.934631

Núñez-Pacheco, C. (2022). Dialoguing with Tangible Traces: A Method to Elicit Autoethnographic Narratives. ACM TEI Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI ’22). https://doi.org/10.1145/3490149.3502255

Núñez-Pacheco, C., & Loke, L. (2018). Towards a Technique for Articulating Aesthetic Experiences in Design using Focusing and the Felt Sense. The Design Journal, 21(4), 583–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2018.1467680

Núñez-Pacheco, C., & Loke, L. (in press). Focusing for Interaction Design: An Introspective Somatic Method. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501978

Popova, K., Garrett, R., Núñez-Pacheco, C., Lampinen, A., & Höök, K. (in press). Vulnerability as an Ethical Stance in Soma Design Processes. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors and Computer Systems (CHI ‘22). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501994

Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds. University of Minnesota Press.

Schiphorst, T. (2011). Self-evidence: Applying Somatic Connoisseurship to Experience Design. CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979640

Schleicher, D., Jones, P., & Kachur, O. (2010). Bodystorming as Embodied Designing. Interactions, 17(6), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1145/1865245.1865256

Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. Jossey-Bass.

Ståhl, A., Tsaknaki, V., & Balaam, M. (2021). Validity and Rigour in Soma Design-Sketching with the Soma. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 28(6), 38:1-38:36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3470132

Tsaknaki, V., Jenkins, T., Boer, L., Homewood, S., Howell, N., & Sanches, P. (2020). Challenges and Opportunities for Designing with Biodata as Material. Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420063

Turmo Vidal, L. (2021). Designing for Intercorporeality: An Interaction Design Approach to Technology-Supported Movement Learning [Doctoral Dissertation, Uppsala University]. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1590421&dswid=1650

Windlin, C., Ståhl, A., Sanches, P., Tsakna-Ki, V., Karpashevich, P., Balaam, M.-L., & Höök, K. (2019). Soma Bits -Mediating Technology to Orchestrate Bodily Experiences. Article 25. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7855799.v2

Zweistra, C. A. (2019). Closing the Empathy Gap: Technology, Ethics, and the Other [Doctoral Dissertation, Delft University of Technology]. https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:7cf71865-bdff-4c72-b3d7-c6d464594fd6