Co-diseñar la resiliencia: Desarrollo de habilidades prácticas y sociales a través de la reparación situada
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Las injusticias ambientales y sociales derivadas de la cultura del consumo instan a redescubrir la reparación como medio para enfrentar a la creciente precariedad. Este artículo presenta un esfuerzo en ese sentido: un programa piloto realizado en zonas regionales de Queensland, cuyo propósito era reinsertar a jóvenes en situación de riesgo a través de prácticas de reparación creativa. El programa les ofrecía la oportunidad de reparar objetos usados y reutilizar materiales en colaboración con mentores, profesionales creativos y pares. La experiencia vivida por las personas jóvenes que participaron fue documentada mediante un taller de co-diseño basado en hallazgos derivados de entrevistas y datos visuales. Los resultados indican que el desarrollo de habilidades prácticas y sociales puede enactar la autoconfianza, la existencia de comunidades de reparación y la conservación de los recursos. Los resultados fueron incluidos, con el plan detallado del programa, en un toolkit diseñado para ayudar a otras comunidades regionales que enfrentan desafíos similares. Las enseñanzas del programa confirmaron que la reparación con enfoque situado responde a una condición global y es capaz de abordar pragmáticamente las emergencias ambientales y sociales.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
NOTA DE COPYRIGHT
Todos los contenidos de esta edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo licencia Creative Commons de “Atribución-Copartirigual 4.0 Internacional” (CC-BY-SA). Cualquier reproducción total o parcial del material deberá citar su procedencia.
Los derechos de las imágenes publicadas pertenecen a sus autores, quienes otorgan a Diseña la licencia para su uso. La gestión de los permisos y la autorización de publicación de las imágenes (o de cualquier material) que contenga derechos de autor y sus consecuentes derechos de reproducción en esta publicación es de exclusiva responsabilidad de los autores de los artículos.
Citas
Armstrong, L., Bailey, J., Julier, G., & Kimbell, L. (2014). Social Design Futures: HEI Research and the AHRC. University of Brighton.
Aslin, H. J., & Brown, V. A. (2004). Towards Whole of Community Engagement: A Practical Toolkit. Murray-Darling Basin Commission.
Australian Government, Department of Social Services. (2023). National Centre for Place-Based Collaboration (Nexus Centre). https://www.dss.gov.au/place-based-collaboration
Bauman, Z. (2013). Consuming Life. John Wiley & Sons.
Bennett, J., Boydell, K., Davidson, J., & Hooker, C. (2022). Arts, Creativity and Mental Wellbeing: Research, Practice and Lived Experience. Australia Council for the Arts. https://australiacouncil.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Creativity-and-Wellbeing-Summit-Discussion-Paper-3.pdf
Black, B., Hendry, B., Wright, A. C., & Collings, S. (2023). Co-Design with People with Lived Experience: Designing Resources to Communicate with Children and Young People in Care about their Family Time Contact Visits. The British Journal of Social Work, 53(3), 1352–1367. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac235
Boydell, K. M., Sinopoli, V. M., Stasiulis, E., Gladstone, B. M., Tilleczek, K., Gibson, A. F., Tilleczek, W., & Hodgins, M. (2021). Graffiti Walls: Arts-based Mental Health Knowledge Translation with Young People in Secondary Schools. In D. Lupton & D. Leahy (Eds.), Creative Approaches to Health Education (pp. 73–86). Routledge.
Brown, R., & Jeanneret, N. (2015). Re-engaging At-Risk Youth through Art – The Evolution Program. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 16(14).
Brownlee, H. (2003). Constructing Youth Engagement: An Outline of Benefits and Shortcomings. Teaching Artist Journal, 1(2), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1541180XTAJ0102-03
Butler, J. (2009). Performativity, Precarity and Sexual Politics. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 4(3), i–xiii.
Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative Approaches to Assessing Student Engagement Rates. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(13), 1–10.
Davidson, J. W., & Krause, A. E. (2018). Social and Applied Psychological Explorations of Music, Health and Well-Being. In N. Sunderland, N. Lewandowski, D. Bendrups, & B.-L. Bartleet (Eds.), Music, Health and Wellbeing: Exploring Music for Health Equity and Social Justice (pp. 33–63). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95284-7_3
Davie, A. R. (2015). Engaging Young People in Regional, Rural and Remote Australia. Australian Clearinghouse for Youth Studies.
Denis, J., & Pontille, D. (2015). Material Ordering and the Care of Things. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(3), 338–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914553129
Dewberry, E. L., Saca, L., Moreno, M., Sheldrick, L., Sinclair, M., Makatsoris, C., & Charter, M. (2016). A Landscape of Repair. Proceedings of the Sustainable Innovation 2016. Circular Economy Innovation and Design. Towards Sustainable Product Design: 21st International Conference, 76–85.
Dillard, R., Newman, T. J., & Kim, M. (2019). Promoting Youth Competence Through Balanced and Restorative Justice: A Community-Based PYD Approach. Journal of Youth Development, 14(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2019.804
Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. C. (1979). The World of Goods: Towards an Anthropology of Consumption. Basic Books.
Ellsworth, E. A. (2005). Places of Learning: Media, Architecture, Pedagogy. Routledge.
Escobar, A. (2004). Beyond the Third World: Imperial Globality, Global Coloniality and Anti-globalisation Social Movements. Third World Quarterly, 25(1), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000185417
Esposito, L., & Perez, F. M. (2014). Neoliberalism and the Commodification of Mental Health. Humanity & Society, 38(4), 414–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597614544958
European Commission. (2018). Social Innovation Toolkit 2018, European Social Innovation Competition. https://www.kl.nl/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Social-Innovation-Toolkit-2018.pdf
Fuller, S. (2009). Youth Participation in Arts, Heritage, Culture and Community: A National Conversation. Prepared by Shauna Fuller, Atlantic Evaluation Group, for Canadian Heritage, Citizen Participation Branch. Canadian Heritage. https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/384873/publication.html
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008). Diverse Economies: Performative Practices for “Other Worlds.” Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 613–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508090821
Graziano, V., & Trogal, K. (2019). Repair Matters. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 19(2), 203–227.
Jackson, S. J. (2014). Rethinking Repair. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society (pp. 221–239). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9042.003.0015
Jackson, S. J., & Kang, L. (2014). Breakdown, Obsolescence and Reuse: HCI and the Art of Repair. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557332
Kalantidou, E. (2022). Transformative Repair for Social Change: A Toolkit for Upskilling At-risk Youth in Regional Communities [Report]. Griffith University. https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/handle/10072/422339
Kalantidou, E., & Brennan. (2022). Theory of Change. In E. Kalantidou, Transformative Repair for Social Change: A Toolkit for Upskilling At-risk Youth in Regional Communities. Griffith University. https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/handle/10072/422339
Kasser, T., & Kanner, A. D. (Eds.). (2004). Psychology and Consumer Culture: The Struggle for a Good Life in a Materialistic World. American Psychological Association.
Mackay, H. (1997). Consumption and Everyday Life. Sage.
McCarthy, K. F., Ondaatje, E. H., Zakaras, L., & Brooks, A. (2004). Gifts of the Muse: Reframing the Debate about the Benefits of the Arts. Rand Corporation.
Muir, K., & Bennett, S. (2014). The Compass: Your Guide to Social Impact Measurement. University of New South Wales.
Nesta. (2015). DYI. Development Impact & You: Practical Tools to Trigger & Support Social Innovation. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/diy-toolkit-full-download-a4-size.pdf
OECD. (2001). The Well-being of Nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264189515-en
Oliver, L., & Cataldo, M. L. (2019). Imagining Ourselves, Crafting Our Own Narratives for Change: People with Lived Expertise as Creators in Research and Practice Methods. Parity, 32(7), 10–12.
Roeper, J. de, & Savelsberg, H. J. (2009). Challenging the Youth Policy Imperative: Engaging Young People through the Arts. Journal of Youth Studies, 12(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260802672820
Rubenis, N. (2016). Crafting Waste. Craft + Design Canberra. https://craftanddesigncanberra.org/blogs/past-exhibitions-2016/crafting-waste
Schlechty, P. C. (2001). Shaking Up the Schoolhouse: How to Support and Sustain Educational Innovation. Jossey-Bass.
Service Design Tools. (2022). Service Design Tools: The Open Collection of Tools and Tutorials that Helps Dealing with Complex Design Challenges. https://servicedesigntools.org/
Thiele, M., & Marsden, S. (2003). Engaging Art: The Artful Dodgers Studio: A Theoretical Model of Practice. Jesuit Social Services.
Waldinger, R., & Schulz, M. (2023). The Good Life: Lessons from the World’s Longest Scientific Study of Happiness. Simon and Schuster.