Reading & Polemics in Real Presences, by George Steiner: Paradoxes vs. Aporiai

Main Article Content

Armando Pego Puigbó

Abstract

Real Presences (1989), perhaps the best-known work by George Steiner, is usually introduced as a vindication of high-culture, humanist reading and aesthetic values inherent to artistic masterpieces. This paper is based on the arguments of anti-deconstructionist theory raised by Steiner, in the context of US academy debates. Contrary to the proposals of Paul de Man or Stanley Fish, among others, Steiner’s work does not represent a relapse into a realistic metaphysics aesthetically created. The provocative reference to God is not an alibi to resolve the question of meaning outside the text but «hope» to be fulfi lled «within» the text. If read sceptically, its aporiai become paradoxes with tentatively numinous language.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

Armando Pego Puigbó

Universitat Ramon Llull. Barcelona, España
apego@fi losofi a.url.edu