The structural couplings between religious, legal, systems in contemporaneity, and the normatizations of fundamentalisms

Abstract

The present work intends to approach the structural relations that, contemporaneously, have been established between the religious and juridical systems, through the intersection of rules and resources between them. The main objective of the work is the search for a democratic sense for the constitutionally adequate right to religious freedom. The dialectical method was used, according to the famous triad: thesis, antithesis and synthesis. The initial results indicate that the couplings positive in the American system are antidemocratic, whereas the Brazilian hermeneutical perspectives are opposite, since they consolidate democracy in what depends the right to religious freedom.