This is an outdated version published on 1999-12-30. Read the most recent version.

¿Puede ser moderno un diccionario académico?

Authors

  • M. Natalia Castillo Fadic Academia Chilena de la Lengua

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.4.23

Abstract

Modern lexicography, understood as a science applied to language, tends to be descriptive. Does this mean that academic dictionaries, clearly normative, cannnot be modern? In order to address this question, the concepts of ‘descriptivism’ and ‘normativity’ , their inter-relations and their manifestations in lexicography are revised. The necessity to distinguish between the dictionary’s normativity (intrinsic) and the reader´s normativity (extrinsic), and the notion that, although any lexicopraphic work may be extrinsically normative, it is the lexicographer’s task to regulate such normativity and to accept that dictionaries must serve a standardizing purpose, regardless their modern and descriptive claims. Modernization of academic lexicography can be pursued from these premises.

Author Biography

M. Natalia Castillo Fadic, Academia Chilena de la Lengua

Investigadora de la Academia Chilena de la Lengua

Published

1999-12-30

Versions

How to Cite

Castillo Fadic, M. N. (1999). ¿Puede ser moderno un diccionario académico?. Onomázein, (4), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.4.23

Issue

Section

Articles